god and republicans
candace at the christian agnostic has some thoughts on the subject, as well as a post showing how bush contradicts jesus.
Where dreams come to die. Or not. Sometimes Erik says stuff, too.
candace at the christian agnostic has some thoughts on the subject, as well as a post showing how bush contradicts jesus.
nick lewis is tackling the subject as it relates to history. do i agree with everything he's saying: not really. but it is worth the read. really, it is. go read it now. go.
do women look any hotter than when they're wearing glasses? i don't think so. i ran into an old high school friend and was taken aback. it lead me to this question, though: am i the only one from high school that let themselves go?
my dad told me one today i hadn't heard. he was very proud of it, so i'll share it here: the democratic party: so full of crap they need two johns.
knowing that everyone is always on the lookout for a great movie, here are some of my favorites (in no particular order) that have not garnered much attention:
i am giving my friend in kazakhstan a crash course on baseball. his position is that baseball is a great medium to stay in touch with america, and maybe he'll even teach the game to his students. while he favors the rangers, i'll let that slide. it's great to see baseball acting as a banner for america.
Many thanks to the liberal slayer for sending me this story on the subject.
If two adults want to wed, let them. If they find a cleric to grace their nuptials, hallelujah -- although signing a contract should suffice. Clergy and laity should decide who may and may not marry in America's religious institutions.
As for child-rearing, same-sex-marriage opponents should explain why couples who fail or refuse to reproduce or adopt may enjoy matrimonial benefits. If "the core purpose of marriage is to bind children to their mothers and fathers," as Stanley Kurtz argued July 1 on National Review Online, marriage licenses should expire after, say, five years if husbands and wives neither bear nor adopt children.
i have been shouted down many times of late in many places about my unwillingness to accept religion as anything other than widely accepted superstition. so i pose these to questions: what differentiates a religion (in most of these debates christianity) from a superstition? and, what proof tangible proof do you put your faith in?
this story bothers me on two levels: first, isn't this the kind of action that shows that "the terrorists have won?" and in the extreme this seems like an attempt to justify holding power in the face of losing an election. think about it: bush is set up to lose the election, then word comes of a possible attack and the vote is postponed indefinitely.
you really have to feel bad for the guy. he had a chance to be the best ever, and now he get hurts every year like clockwork. while this throws a damper on the 500 hr outfield, i still hope that this all-star game will highlight what a great career this man has had. on the topic of his injuries, could it be that the reds' medical staff dropped the ball? he never had this many injuries in seattle.
these guys rock. they are masters at weaving stories that a quirky yet magical. who wouldn't want to live in the worlds they create? here is my ranking of their films: